Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01377 24 11 22 now.
 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'No convincing need' for Leconfield housing scheme



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 August 2008
PLANS to build five detached houses on a site in Leconfield look set to be turned down by East Riding Council.
An application by Cammack Builders Ltd to develop land south west of Mere Glen in Leconfield will go before the council's eastern area planning sub-committee on Monday (August 11).

Planning officers are recommending that the application should be
refused because they say it does not accord with planning policies relating to sustainability and housing supply.

Seven letters of objection to the application have been submitted by nearby residents, who claim it is an overdevelopment of the site, that increased traffic will endanger pedestrians, and the scheme could have an impact on flooding in the area. Objectors also claim that local schools and services are not adequate to accommodate more houses.

But Leconfield Parish Council recommends that the application should be approved, pointing out that the developer is continuing to liaise with the local planning authority on drainage.

The applicants point out that the village has good public transport links and services. They say the site is mostly made up of the rear of gardens from three houses that face onto Main Street, claiming the design is characteristic of a rural setting.

Planning officers say the site is within Leconfield's development limits and is previously-developed land.

They say the village has a range of services, but say there are a number of plots with planning consent which have not yet been developed, and say the applicants have not provided convincing evidence to show that there is a need for more houses.



The full article contains 270 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 August 2008 2:27 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Driffield
 
 
  

 
 

News


Sport


Have your say


Leisure news


Local community


Peep at the Past


Features and special publications


Local information


Local links and telephone numbers


Community websites


Headlines from the UK regions


Sports organisation links


Education links


Customer service


Sisters newspapers


Travel


Extras




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.