Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 01377 24 11 22 now.
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Driffield Post site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Officers give house plan thumbs down



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 October 2008
OUTLINE plans for a new house in Brandesburton are set to be considered by East Riding councillors next week.
But planning officers have recommended that the scheme for land south-west of 5 Barley Garth in the village should be refused.

They say that the scheme for a two-storey property, submitted by applicant Mr John Barrett, would dominate neighbouring
homes and be out of character with the area.

However, Mr Barrett argues that the property had been designed and positioned to avoid problems of overlooking.

The case submitted on his behalf stated the development would not affect the amenity space of existing properties and that upstairs windows would be restricted and obscure glazed.

The officers’ recommendation for refusal comes despite strong support for the scheme from the village’s parish council.

Highways officials, Yorkshire Water and the Environment Agency also raised no objections.

But a report to the council’s eastern area planning sub-committee, which meets on Monday, states that three letters of objection have been received from residents.

The letters raised concerns over loss of privacy and daylight, the style of the development and the impact on the environment and local drainage systems.

Officers said that while there was no principled objection to a house being built on the land. they believed the plans were an over-development of a site that was not of an adequate shape or site to accommodate the proposed building.



The full article contains 244 words and appears in Driffield Post newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 October 2008 12:55 PM
  • Source: Driffield Post
  • Location: Driffield
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you expect the credit crunch crisis to alter before Christmas?
Yes, I think it will ease
No - I think it will get worse
I think it will be a long time before it sorts itself out

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.